A One-World System of Government

TimeWatch Editorial
November 4, 2015

In 1990, a Jesuit Priest named Malachi Martin published a book entitled “Keys of This Blood.” Malachi Martin is described as a consummate Vatican insider and intelligence expert. According to Biblio.com:

“Martin was born July 23, 1921, in County Kerry, Ireland and studied at the Catholic University of Louvain in Belgium. There he received doctorates in the Semitic Languages, Archeology and Oriental History. Subsequently, he studied at Oxford and at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. He was ordained on August 15, 1954. From 1958 to 1964 he served the Holy See at the Vatican in Rome. Martin was the private secretary of Augustin Cardinal Bea in Rome and lived and worked at the Vatican for many years. In 1964, Pope Paul VI released Father Martin from the vows of poverty and obedience in the Jesuit Order, but confirmed his vow of celibacy.”

The complete name of the book referred to in my opening statement is “Keys of This Blood: The Struggle for World Dominion between Pope John Paul II, Russia, and the West.” Because of the specificity of the title, there are many that have considered the relevance of the entire volume to be null and void. First, they say, as “The Cold War Museum” website so eloquently puts it:

“In December of 1991, as the world watched in amazement, the Soviet Union disintegrated into fifteen separate countries. Its collapse was hailed by the west as a victory for freedom, a triumph of democracy over totalitarianism, and evidence of the superiority of capitalism over socialism. The United States rejoiced as its formidable enemy was brought to its knees, thereby ending the Cold War which had hovered over these two superpowers since the end of World War II. Indeed, the breakup of the Soviet Union transformed the entire world political situation, leading to a complete reformulation of political, economic and military alliances all over the globe.”

So, they argue, since the Soviet Union is dissolved, there can be no competition coming from Russia. Secondly, Pope John Paul II, born Karol Józef Wojtyła, served as Pope from 1978 and died in 2005, so there can be no competition coming from him either.

However, Malachi Martin saw a competition that was not limited to John Paul II but included the Papacy, regardless of who the Pope might be. This is why his opening statement on page 15 says this:

“Willing or not, ready or not, we are all involved in an all-out, no holds barred, three-way global competition. Most of us are not competitors, however. We are the stakes. For the competition is about who will establish the first one-world system of government that has ever existed in the society of nations. It is about who will hold and wield the dual power of authority and control over each of us as individuals and over all of us together as a community; over the entire six billion people expected by demographers to inhabit the earth by early in the third millennium.”

That description is incredibly accurate. He is obviously not guessing, but describing a plan that he has been made aware of first hand. The one thing missing from the statement is the extreme covert nature of the battle being waged by one of the protagonists. Whereas “The West” and “Russia” are not being assisted by individuals inside the Vatican, The Papacy has for some time now, had a myriad of insurgents strategically inserted in her competitors’ systems of government. If that fact surprises you, then you should know that The Papacy is quite practiced at this sort of infiltration. Listen to Eric Jon Phelps in his book: “Vatican Assassins” Vol 3, page 217:

“Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversive plots against the welfare of the state, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute [Jesuit Thomas J. Campbell, The Jesuits, 1534-1921] . . . practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection.”

This means that they have done it in the past, been caught and expelled. The problem is, they have never abandoned the method. In this our present case they have passed beyond the threshold of exposure and expulsion. They are now embedded. As we shall see in part 2 of this article, victory has already been guaranteed.

Cameron A. Bowen