A Genetically Modified World – Part 1
TimeWatch Editorial
October 30, 2015
If you take a look in our archive, TimeWatch Daily, October 18th and 23rd 2015, you will find some articles that highlight the matter of Genetically Modified Foods. Today, I came across an article written by John P. Thomas, and published October 29, 2015, entitled: “Eugenics in the United States Today: Are we on the Same Path Nazi Germany Followed?” Here is what he says in the very first paragraph:
“Eugenics was dedicated to cleansing and purifying humanity from “inferior” members with the hope of solving various social problems related to poverty, disability, and illness. To accomplish this, it sought to create a superior race of people and to use forced sterilization and extermination to eliminate future generations of defective human beings. Darwin’s theory of evolution was used to justify the practice of eugenics. Later, when eugenics fell from favor, modern genetics began to grow up from the ashes of the former movement.”
John P. Thomas’ bio found on the Health Impact News Website says that he is a health writer for Health Impact News. He holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Michigan, and a Master of Science in Public Health (M.S.P.H.) from the School of Public Health, Department of Health Administration, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. John specializes in environmental health, but writes on a variety of issues.
If you recall Adolf Hitler’s “blonde haired blue eyed” “master race” that he was intent on creating, you need to know that this was based upon the theory of Eugenics. Mr. Thomas puts it this way:
“Eugenicists believe that principles of Darwin’s theory regarding “the survival of the fittest” can be used to support the elimination of weak and undesirable people from society. They believe that human beings are inherently no different than animals, and therefore we can and should be bred like animals. A farmer does not allow deficient cows in his herd to reproduce, and in the same way, eugenicists believe that certain people in our society should control human reproduction.”
Now of course all of this is predicated upon the theory of evolution. These people believe that not only are we continually ‘evolving’ but an integral part of that process is that we are empowered to enhance the evolution, or redirect it as we see fit. Mr. Thomas continues:
“Eugenicists believe that natural attraction, affection, and love between men and women should not be the basis upon which procreation should be based. Rather, scientists and the medical system should provide scientific and common sense control over the individuals who should be allowed to mate with one another. People with the best traits should be encouraged to reproduce, and those with defective traits should be prevented from producing children by various methods such as sterilization, segregation, and, if necessary, death.”
The obvious arrogance of that belief is nevertheless surpassed by their continued covert plan to ‘find a way’ to accomplish their goal. Mr. Thomas, in part 2 of the series entitled: Will the Modern Genetics Movement Preserve Life or Threaten Life? Says this:
“Most proponents of corporation-based modern genetics continue to cling to a belief that the environment plays a very small role in human development. In their minds, the “nature versus nurture” argument continues to be heavily weighted toward the unchangeable contribution of nature. Genetics seems to convey the idea that there is a gene for everything; the totality of who we are and who we will become is predetermined by our personal configuration of genes. They don’t always say this explicitly; but it is the thrust of their message.”
What is tremendously disturbing is that the global population is effectively being coercively persuaded that the genetic pathway is indeed the answer to a number of yet to be identified problems. The undisclosed results of Genetically Modified Foods are but an introduction to the experimentation with population control. The aggressive approach taken with regard to the replacement of the simple organic species is an indication of the hidden agenda that is already in play. Regarding this, Mr. Thomas says:
“If every illness is ultimately genetic as pharmaceutical companies and other corporations are telling us, then we have no hope for sustaining health unless we can afford to purchase it. We have no hope for solving social problems unless someone fixes the genes that cause our human dysfunction. On this common ground, modern genetic science and its predecessor eugenics sit comfortably side by side. The former proponents of eugenics and the modern proponents of genetics see a scientific world in which the control and manipulation of genes is the answer to every problem.”
Like the Manhattan Project which was a research and development project that produced the first nuclear weapons during World War II, led by the United States with the support of the United Kingdom and Canada, the Eugenics nuclear impact continues today with perhaps as deadly a consequence.
Cameron A. Bowen
